PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
161.63%
Net income growth of 161.63% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-11.90%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 20.31%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-100.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 99.95%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-71.67%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-365.95%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
59.85%
AR growth of 59.85% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-4.46%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-40.54%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-589.33%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is -62.29%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
111.65%
Growth of 111.65% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-431.41%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is -17.08%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-63.82%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.75%
Purchases growth of 62.75% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
11.99%
Proceeds growth of 11.99% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-43.93%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
36.96%
Investing flow of 36.96% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.