PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
144.23%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 31.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
3.55%
D&A growth significantly below Solar median of 17.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a lighter drag on profits vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.25%
SBC growth of 28.25% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
65.78%
Working capital of 65.78% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
69.80%
A moderate inventory rise while Solar is negative at -9.08%. Peter Lynch might see peers adopting more cautious stocking if demand is uncertain.
-100.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
66.63%
Growth of 66.63% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-300.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 48.87%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
143.24%
CFO growth of 143.24% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
12.80%
We have some CapEx expansion while Solar median is negative at -100.00%. Peter Lynch would see peers possibly pausing expansions more aggressively.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
69.96%
Purchases growth of 69.96% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-55.04%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
171.29%
Under 50% of Solar median of 64.49% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would suspect a large mismatch or potential waste if outflows are too high vs. peers.
117.47%
Slight expansions while Solar median is negative at -100.00%. Peter Lynch wonders if peers are more cautious or have fewer investment opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.21%
Buyback growth of 74.21% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.