PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-133.34%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-3.91%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-2199.28%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-788.97%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
386.43%
AR growth of 386.43% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-76.13%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-118.48%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
103.02%
Growth of 103.02% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
439.84%
Growth of 439.84% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-216.20%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is -47.34%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
54.87%
CapEx growth of 54.87% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-16.94%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
77.27%
Growth of 77.27% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
72.82%
Investing flow of 72.82% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
766.48%
Debt repayment growth of 766.48% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
-184.56%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.