PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
345.34%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 9.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
10.04%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 8.09%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
44.97%
Deferred tax growth of 44.97% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
28.64%
SBC growth of 28.64% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
56.22%
A slight increase while Solar median is negative at -3.71%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
-259.83%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
191.59%
Inventory growth of 191.59% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-2268.79%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-273.90%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
105.32%
CFO growth of 105.32% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
0.84%
CapEx growth under 50% of Solar median of 0.06% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.74%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-260.93%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-93.26%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
266.93%
Debt repayment growth of 266.93% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.66%
Buyback growth of 67.66% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.