PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-46.92%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 3.75%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
3.62%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 4.65%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
389.61%
Deferred tax growth of 389.61% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
12.25%
SBC growth of 12.25% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
174.27%
A slight increase while Solar median is negative at -21.05%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
71.27%
AR growth of 71.27% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-67.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 36.20%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.39%
Some yoy usage while Solar median is negative at -205.02%. Peter Lynch would see peers cutting these lines more aggressively or not needing them.
55.61%
Growth of 55.61% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
2691.15%
CFO growth of 2691.15% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
10.33%
We have some CapEx expansion while Solar median is negative at -4.60%. Peter Lynch would see peers possibly pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
557.36%
Proceeds growth of 557.36% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-177.12%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-55.83%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is -4.60%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-104.09%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.20%
Buyback growth of 23.20% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.