PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
231.42%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 11.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
4.76%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 4.05%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
-86.46%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
35.15%
SBC growth of 35.15% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
16.52%
Working capital of 16.52% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-508.40%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
43.48%
Inventory growth of 43.48% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
319.07%
AP growth of 319.07% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-140.57%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 58.30%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
48.38%
A moderate rise while Solar median is negative at -218.44%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
57.45%
Positive CFO growth while Solar median is negative at -0.82%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
92.35%
CapEx growth of 92.35% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1927.59%
Growth of 1927.59% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
271.13%
Under 50% of Solar median of 42.97% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
-356.84%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.49%
Buyback growth of 29.49% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.