PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
708.13%
Net income growth of 708.13% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-2.72%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 1.36%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-143.44%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
4.10%
SBC growth of 4.10% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
150.95%
Working capital of 150.95% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-181.74%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-153.50%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
80.99%
AP growth of 80.99% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
137.65%
Growth of 137.65% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
112.79%
Growth of 112.79% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
946.34%
CFO growth of 946.34% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-235.47%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2383.17%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-149.58%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-229.08%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
400.53%
Debt repayment growth of 400.53% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.63%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.