PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-6871.81%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -41.95%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
6.33%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 11.89%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
104.01%
Deferred tax growth of 104.01% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-2.63%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
77.62%
Working capital of 77.62% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-194.05%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
136.89%
Inventory growth of 136.89% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
8.02%
AP growth of 8.02% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
56.17%
Growth of 56.17% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
1530.18%
A moderate rise while Solar median is negative at -30.27%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
39.38%
CFO growth of 39.38% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
47.70%
We have some CapEx expansion while Solar median is negative at -3.71%. Peter Lynch would see peers possibly pausing expansions more aggressively.
101.45%
Acquisition growth of 101.45% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-50.00%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
25166.86%
Proceeds growth of 25166.86% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
126.93%
Under 50% of Solar median of 7.80% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would suspect a large mismatch or potential waste if outflows are too high vs. peers.
137.35%
Investing flow of 137.35% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
83.67%
Buyback growth of 83.67% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.