PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-150.75%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
6.21%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 11.11%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
1306.90%
Deferred tax growth of 1306.90% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-7.55%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
92.99%
Working capital of 92.99% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-5.15%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-129.49%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is -32.67%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
204.80%
AP growth of 204.80% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
213.44%
Under 50% of Solar median of 58.58% if negative or far above if positive. Jim Chanos would sense potential red flags or large tie-ups in these rarely monitored accounts.
699.03%
Growth of 699.03% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
120.36%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 12.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
25.82%
We have some CapEx expansion while Solar median is negative at -1.32%. Peter Lynch would see peers possibly pausing expansions more aggressively.
8190.69%
Acquisition growth of 8190.69% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-29.87%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-102.55%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-228.81%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is -136.94%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
312.87%
We repay slightly more while Solar median is negative at -1.66%. Peter Lynch would see a relative advantage in lowering debt obligations vs. peers adding leverage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.51%
Buyback growth of 12.51% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.