PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
77.59%
Net income growth of 77.59% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-35.92%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
82.19%
Deferred tax growth of 82.19% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
14.41%
SBC growth of 14.41% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
4740.72%
Working capital of 4740.72% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
194.15%
AR growth of 194.15% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
234.29%
Inventory growth of 234.29% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-100.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
114.13%
Growth of 114.13% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-94.79%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 26.71%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
521.21%
CFO growth of 521.21% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-164.44%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-200.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
99.44%
Purchases growth of 99.44% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
3767200.00%
Proceeds growth of 3767200.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
16357.52%
Growth of 16357.52% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
558.45%
Investing flow of 558.45% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-318.13%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.47%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.