PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
10.29%
Positive net income growth while Solar median is negative at -9.62%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
34.36%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 1.89%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
-203.41%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-7.49%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-168.26%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
80.12%
AR growth of 80.12% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-62.07%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is -134.22%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-347.40%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-74.17%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is -84.81%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-202.05%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is -80.38%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
28.61%
CapEx growth of 28.61% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-76.90%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-69.82%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-80.95%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
7.95%
Debt repayment growth of 7.95% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-225.38%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.