PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-12.95%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -3.59%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
0.42%
D&A growth significantly below Solar median of 17.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a lighter drag on profits vs. peers.
315.48%
Deferred tax growth of 315.48% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-9.36%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
75.62%
Working capital of 75.62% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-20.95%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
575.36%
Inventory growth of 575.36% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-2123.16%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
116.62%
Growth of 116.62% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
282.25%
Under 50% of Solar median of 15.74% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
67.36%
CFO growth of 67.36% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
8.91%
CapEx growth of 8.91% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-82.69%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 37.35%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-211.05%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 30.37%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
99.82%
Debt repayment growth of 99.82% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
66.05%
Buyback growth of 66.05% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.