PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
42.34%
Net income growth of 42.34% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-15.57%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-151.38%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-18.44%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
92.37%
Working capital of 92.37% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-146.33%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-29.47%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
100.22%
AP growth of 100.22% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-137.55%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-183.71%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
28.86%
CFO growth of 28.86% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
45.12%
CapEx growth under 50% of Solar median of 10.77% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
85.64%
Purchases growth of 85.64% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.58%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
53.06%
Investing flow of 53.06% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
1414.26%
Debt repayment growth of 1414.26% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.87%
Buyback growth of 82.87% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.