PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-198.26%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-0.31%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
95.69%
Deferred tax growth of 95.69% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-0.12%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
11187.25%
Working capital of 11187.25% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-253.01%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
81.98%
Inventory growth of 81.98% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
34640.94%
AP growth of 34640.94% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
931.39%
Growth of 931.39% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
947.84%
Growth of 947.84% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
862.29%
CFO growth of 862.29% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-360.94%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-899.45%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-569.35%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-137.35%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or acquisitions financed by new shares.
-15.49%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.