PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
57.20%
Net income growth of 57.20% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-11.73%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
4394.55%
Deferred tax growth of 4394.55% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-8.03%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-20.41%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is -97.76%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
153.24%
Slight AR growth while Solar median is negative at -28.82%. Peter Lynch would question if peers more aggressively collect or if this firm invests in growth.
-107.15%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is -93.97%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-119.52%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
36.75%
Growth of 36.75% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-89.45%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is -95.85%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-31.01%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is -79.71%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
28.88%
CapEx growth under 50% of Solar median of 13.12% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
181.89%
Growth of 181.89% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
64.47%
Under 50% of Solar median of 13.12% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
-3049.75%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4014.56%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.