PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-95.57%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
1.22%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 0.79%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
75.59%
Deferred tax growth of 75.59% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
20.63%
SBC growth of 20.63% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
56.94%
Working capital of 56.94% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-94.41%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
149.50%
Inventory growth of 149.50% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
195.83%
AP growth of 195.83% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-104.82%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
130.36%
Growth of 130.36% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
13.88%
CFO growth of 13.88% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-80.19%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
123.11%
Growth of 123.11% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-179.52%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
346.36%
Debt repayment growth of 346.36% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.24%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.