PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
679.42%
Net income growth of 679.42% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
30.88%
D&A growth of 30.88% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
542.07%
Deferred tax growth of 542.07% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-0.53%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
16.99%
Working capital of 16.99% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
125.75%
AR growth of 125.75% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
749.51%
Inventory growth of 749.51% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
136.48%
AP growth of 136.48% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-545.94%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-341.00%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 86.19%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
477.41%
CFO growth of 477.41% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-98.76%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-11918.40%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-891.13%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-384.47%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
32350.88%
Debt repayment growth of 32350.88% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.56%
Buyback growth of 51.56% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.