PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-121.56%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -49.26%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-15.17%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.96%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-121.56%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-0.78%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-69.90%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is -42.58%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
126.87%
AR growth of 126.87% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-158.13%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-213.14%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
100.93%
Some yoy usage while Solar median is negative at -7.58%. Peter Lynch would see peers cutting these lines more aggressively or not needing them.
127.29%
Under 50% of Solar median of 21.73% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-192.69%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
45.69%
CapEx growth under 50% of Solar median of 4.98% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-861.93%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 91.54%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
68.83%
Investing flow of 68.83% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-374.75%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2400.26%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.