PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
19.22%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 8.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
10.08%
D&A growth of 10.08% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
85.55%
Deferred tax growth of 85.55% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
3.65%
SBC growth of 3.65% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-59.85%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-0.82%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
79.04%
Inventory growth of 79.04% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-227.44%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-1409.91%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-1356.89%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is -0.05%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-86.96%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-74.34%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 24.61%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.51%
Growth of 50.51% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
491.42%
Under 50% of Solar median of 13.32% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
63.18%
Debt repayment growth of 63.18% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.81%
Buyback growth of 95.81% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.