PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-271.96%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 12.14%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
18.83%
D&A growth of 18.83% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
3657.90%
Deferred tax growth of 3657.90% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
6.11%
SBC growth of 6.11% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
63.38%
Working capital of 63.38% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
598.86%
AR growth of 598.86% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-149.08%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-8.83%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-51.34%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
35.89%
Growth of 35.89% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
50.99%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 28.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
-12.41%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is -16.48%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-109.96%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.80%
Growth of 77.80% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-149.04%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is -7.65%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
99.60%
Debt repayment growth of 99.60% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.30%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.