PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.89%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
8.76%
D&A growth of 8.76% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
57.01%
Deferred tax growth of 57.01% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
10.59%
SBC growth of 10.59% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-205.01%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-91.34%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
10.31%
Inventory growth of 10.31% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
149.26%
AP growth of 149.26% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-380.39%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
38.74%
Under 50% of Solar median of 39.44% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-185.68%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-41.20%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
611.40%
Acquisition growth of 611.40% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.62%
Growth of 3.62% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
138.19%
Investing flow of 138.19% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-3342.90%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.02%
Buyback growth of 34.02% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.