PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.47%
Positive net income growth while Solar median is negative at -13.71%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
3.64%
D&A expands slightly while Solar is negative at -0.93%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
-102.85%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
0.27%
SBC growth of 0.27% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-48.13%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-36.05%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
63.94%
A moderate inventory rise while Solar is negative at -16.97%. Peter Lynch might see peers adopting more cautious stocking if demand is uncertain.
-176.98%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
10.27%
Growth of 10.27% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
117.59%
A moderate rise while Solar median is negative at -30.05%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-24.60%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
42.23%
CapEx growth of 42.23% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-111.59%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Growth of 11.90% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-297.77%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
580.36%
Debt repayment growth of 580.36% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1274.80%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.