PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
9.11%
Net income growth of 9.11% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-2.89%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
245.51%
Deferred tax growth of 245.51% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-0.27%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
20.77%
Working capital of 20.77% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-385.45%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-430.46%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
63.23%
AP growth of 63.23% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
59.72%
Growth of 59.72% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-383.13%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
18.87%
CFO growth of 18.87% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-1.71%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
97.83%
Acquisition growth of 97.83% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
21.68%
Investing flow of 21.68% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
512.16%
Debt repayment growth of 512.16% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.79%
Buyback growth of 95.79% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.