PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-426.48%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -22.05%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
28.98%
D&A growth of 28.98% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-776.53%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-20.81%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
442.78%
Working capital of 442.78% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
123.34%
AR growth of 123.34% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
120.83%
Inventory growth of 120.83% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
90.25%
AP growth of 90.25% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
1370.21%
Growth of 1370.21% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
297.99%
Under 50% of Solar median of 9.32% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
478.71%
CFO growth of 478.71% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-26.26%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-297.92%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is -4.35%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-18.08%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-9328.11%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.01%
Buyback growth of 56.01% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.