PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-850.58%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
19.42%
D&A growth of 19.42% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-3045.17%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-1.12%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
1583.68%
Working capital of 1583.68% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-781.38%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
205.09%
Inventory growth of 205.09% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.87%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
16231.66%
Growth of 16231.66% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
279.96%
CFO growth of 279.96% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-84.96%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
175.37%
Acquisition growth of 175.37% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1234.15%
Growth of 1234.15% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-68.08%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
461.78%
Debt repayment growth of 461.78% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-109.14%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.