PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
960.52%
Net income growth of 960.52% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
0.15%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 0.01%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
495.70%
Deferred tax growth of 495.70% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-14.39%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
135.30%
Working capital of 135.30% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
511.77%
AR growth of 511.77% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
184.38%
Inventory growth of 184.38% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
63.67%
AP growth of 63.67% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-890.78%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-49.71%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 3.11%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
111.51%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
2.84%
CapEx growth under 50% of Solar median of 3.68% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.01%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
88.34%
Debt repayment growth of 88.34% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.78%
Buyback growth of 78.78% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.