PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
145.21%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 19.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-29.50%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-56.05%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
2.77%
SBC growth of 2.77% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-8.46%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-26.49%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-114.81%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
251.90%
AP growth of 251.90% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-120.90%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 20.53%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-107.79%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is -11.76%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-311.47%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
22.82%
CapEx growth of 22.82% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
216.62%
Growth of 216.62% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-503.99%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is -1.11%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
100.00%
Debt repayment growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.96%
Buyback growth of 94.96% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.