PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-112.00%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 35.62%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
10.99%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 0.17%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
-122.16%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-9.82%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-285.82%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
129.25%
Slight AR growth while Solar median is negative at -14.84%. Peter Lynch would question if peers more aggressively collect or if this firm invests in growth.
53.27%
A moderate inventory rise while Solar is negative at -34.77%. Peter Lynch might see peers adopting more cautious stocking if demand is uncertain.
69.14%
AP growth of 69.14% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-106.69%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 39.73%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
109.60%
A moderate rise while Solar median is negative at -53.30%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-367.05%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is -17.16%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-2.44%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.10%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-101.00%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 1.65%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
110.53%
Debt repayment growth of 110.53% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.72%
Buyback growth of 51.72% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.