PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
251.05%
Net income growth of 251.05% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
4.18%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 0.03%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
158.04%
Deferred tax growth of 158.04% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
76.81%
SBC growth of 76.81% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
144.69%
Working capital of 144.69% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
312.93%
AR growth of 312.93% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
222.07%
Inventory growth of 222.07% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
25.15%
AP growth of 25.15% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
198.67%
Growth of 198.67% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-309.22%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
154.55%
CFO growth of 154.55% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-89.69%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is -0.52%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
726.30%
Investing flow of 726.30% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-504.26%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-104.67%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.