PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-212.76%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -1.43%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-43.36%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.88%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-209.19%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-50.84%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-294.08%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-109.07%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-155.30%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
22.47%
AP growth of 22.47% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-239.17%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
204.59%
Under 50% of Solar median of 14.61% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-207.64%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 26.88%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
160.04%
CapEx growth of 160.04% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19379.11%
Growth of 19379.11% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
1934.60%
Investing flow of 1934.60% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
77.12%
Debt repayment growth of 77.12% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.34%
Buyback growth of 81.34% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.