PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
123.96%
Positive net income growth while Solar median is negative at -22.80%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
138.43%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 0.03%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
496.32%
Deferred tax growth of 496.32% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
29.62%
SBC growth of 29.62% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
179.66%
Working capital of 179.66% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
3195.72%
AR growth of 3195.72% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
412.77%
Inventory growth of 412.77% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-16.07%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-166.01%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-176.68%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
89.83%
CFO growth of 89.83% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-305.74%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.94%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-173.67%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
116.41%
Debt repayment growth of 116.41% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-209.02%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.