PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-240.92%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
16.39%
D&A growth of 16.39% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-240.35%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-11.41%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-417.35%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is -4.07%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-125.90%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-300.90%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
354.74%
A slight AP increase while Solar median is negative at -25.34%. Peter Lynch would see competitor peers paying off suppliers more aggressively.
-187.38%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
100.38%
A moderate rise while Solar median is negative at -42.13%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-4410.58%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is -42.74%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-66.78%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 6.31%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12994.15%
Proceeds growth of 12994.15% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-6545.05%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
200.90%
Under 50% of Solar median of 34.24% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
-161.73%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 23.53%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-193.28%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.