PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-94.66%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -1.67%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
18.09%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 0.38%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
3.05%
Deferred tax growth of 3.05% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-17.23%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-115.10%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
109.33%
AR growth of 109.33% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-1446.12%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
292.60%
AP growth of 292.60% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-358.11%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
107.84%
Under 50% of Solar median of 27.23% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-119.63%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 9.27%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
61.42%
CapEx growth of 61.42% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-89.58%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2709.17%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-106.13%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
107.83%
Debt repayment growth of 107.83% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.89%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.