PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-816.60%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is 15.58%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
5.10%
D&A growth under 50% of Solar median of 0.30%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
40.38%
Deferred tax growth of 40.38% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
26.72%
SBC growth of 26.72% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-168.21%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is -0.21%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-847.07%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is -34.08%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
26.57%
Under 50% of Solar median of 3.60% in the negative sense or above it if positive. Jim Chanos would suspect major overstock or mismatched sales if inventory grows too fast vs. industry norms.
-121.59%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
92.32%
Growth of 92.32% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
90.06%
A moderate rise while Solar median is negative at -60.79%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-1062.88%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is -8.33%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-101.33%
CapEx declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
94.26%
Growth of 94.26% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
783.55%
Investing flow of 783.55% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-4287.74%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-437.65%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.