PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
92.26%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Solar median of 33.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
-97.69%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-100.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-73.52%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-98.91%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is -108.17%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-73.45%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is -26.86%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-88.44%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Solar median is -23.49%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-24.95%
AP shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-105.01%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is -25.89%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
54.51%
A moderate rise while Solar median is negative at -33.05%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
82.45%
Positive CFO growth while Solar median is negative at -50.42%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
95.10%
CapEx growth under 50% of Solar median of 24.71% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-285.61%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
96.23%
Investing flow of 96.23% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-108.96%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 1.84%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.