PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
160.27%
Net income growth of 160.27% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
472.13%
D&A growth of 472.13% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-167.22%
SBC declines yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-1003.75%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-1494.99%
AR shrinks yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
9267.16%
Inventory growth of 9267.16% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
69.93%
AP growth of 69.93% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
533.59%
Growth of 533.59% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-217.35%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Solar median is 54.65%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-18.99%
Negative CFO growth while Solar median is 26.86%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
29.81%
CapEx growth of 29.81% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33200.00%
Reduced investing yoy while Solar median is 32.36%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-86.86%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 25.14%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-91.62%
We reduce issuance yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.