PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.70%
Negative net income growth while Solar median is -15.01%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-9.28%
D&A shrinks yoy while Solar median is -0.21%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.81%
SBC growth of 130.81% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
49.14%
A slight increase while Solar median is negative at -48.85%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
51.86%
Slight AR growth while Solar median is negative at -50.86%. Peter Lynch would question if peers more aggressively collect or if this firm invests in growth.
76.86%
A moderate inventory rise while Solar is negative at -33.41%. Peter Lynch might see peers adopting more cautious stocking if demand is uncertain.
459.92%
AP growth of 459.92% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-131.37%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Solar median is 34.53%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
86.99%
A moderate rise while Solar median is negative at -94.66%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
89.72%
CFO growth of 89.72% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
100.00%
CapEx growth under 50% of Solar median of 34.31% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
100.00%
Investing flow of 100.00% while Solar median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-102.53%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-78.77%
We reduce issuance yoy while Solar median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.