PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-89.04%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
117.91%
D&A growth of 117.91% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.97%
Working capital of 32.97% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
134.34%
AR growth of 134.34% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-783.73%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-138.65%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
54.55%
Growth of 54.55% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
2048.96%
Growth of 2048.96% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
88.11%
CFO growth of 88.11% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-28.65%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
43.44%
Proceeds growth of 43.44% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
74.56%
Growth of 74.56% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-195.76%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We reduce issuance yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.