PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-212.24%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
23.02%
D&A growth of 23.02% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
234.21%
Deferred tax growth of 234.21% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
7.24%
SBC growth of 7.24% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-3243.32%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-63.45%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
58.57%
Inventory growth of 58.57% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-248.28%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-396.81%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
-1274.77%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
-459.13%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-29.72%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
62.93%
Growth of 62.93% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
81.13%
Investing flow of 81.13% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.46%
Buyback growth of 32.46% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.