PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-150.75%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
6.21%
D&A growth of 6.21% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
1306.90%
Deferred tax growth of 1306.90% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-7.55%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
92.99%
Working capital of 92.99% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
-5.15%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-129.49%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
204.80%
AP growth of 204.80% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
213.44%
Growth of 213.44% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
699.03%
Growth of 699.03% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
120.36%
CFO growth of 120.36% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
25.82%
CapEx growth of 25.82% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
8190.69%
Acquisition growth of 8190.69% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
-29.87%
Investment purchases shrink yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term cash advantage if no high-return opportunities are missed.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-102.55%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-228.81%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
312.87%
Debt repayment growth of 312.87% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.51%
Buyback growth of 12.51% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.