PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1011.42%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 24.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
1.21%
D&A expands slightly while Energy is negative at -0.22%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
1625.45%
Deferred tax growth of 1625.45% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
2.00%
SBC growth of 2.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-150.07%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is -31.52%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
2643.30%
AR growth of 2643.30% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-87.48%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-114.07%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
24.24%
Growth of 24.24% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-72.18%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is -0.46%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
53.52%
Positive CFO growth while Energy median is negative at -2.97%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
45.27%
CapEx growth under 50% of Energy median of 5.48% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
69.34%
Acquisition growth of 69.34% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-540.12%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
47.56%
Under 50% of Energy median of 6.05% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
-162.72%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1837.91%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.