PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1379.79%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 7.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
7.08%
D&A growth under 50% of Energy median of 0.45%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
63.39%
Deferred tax growth of 63.39% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
2.82%
SBC growth of 2.82% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
45.46%
Working capital of 45.46% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
32.89%
AR growth of 32.89% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
1158.73%
Inventory growth of 1158.73% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-20.76%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
155.36%
Growth of 155.36% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-21.86%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
75.45%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Energy median of 5.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
-89.74%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
83.03%
Acquisition growth of 83.03% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.44%
Growth of 96.44% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
-26.82%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
-100.08%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.63%
Buyback growth of 65.63% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.