PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
128.32%
Net income growth of 128.32% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
18.05%
D&A growth of 18.05% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
395.60%
Deferred tax growth of 395.60% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
63.76%
SBC growth of 63.76% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
-207.91%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-801.27%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
55.84%
Inventory growth of 55.84% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
62.45%
AP growth of 62.45% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-1072.33%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
42.80%
Growth of 42.80% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
93.62%
CFO growth of 93.62% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
67.09%
CapEx growth of 67.09% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
328.08%
Acquisition growth of 328.08% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-48.14%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-64.49%
Reduced investing yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
975.10%
Debt repayment growth of 975.10% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-210.96%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.