PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
814.69%
Net income growth of 814.69% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
-78.48%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
2799.84%
Deferred tax growth of 2799.84% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-0.22%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-118.67%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-125.99%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-228.89%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-253.18%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
297.30%
Growth of 297.30% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-165.75%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
134.63%
CFO growth of 134.63% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
50.41%
CapEx growth of 50.41% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
112.76%
Acquisition growth of 112.76% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
1927.93%
Proceeds growth of 1927.93% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-112.13%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
309.96%
Investing flow of 309.96% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5828.38%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.