PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-240.92%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 4.68%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
16.39%
D&A expands slightly while Energy is negative at -1.46%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
-240.35%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-11.41%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-417.35%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is -58.29%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-125.90%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-300.90%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
354.74%
AP growth of 354.74% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-187.38%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is -13.12%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
100.38%
Under 50% of Energy median of 0.26% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-4410.58%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is -0.14%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
-66.78%
CapEx declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12994.15%
Proceeds growth of 12994.15% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or certain maturities are driving this difference.
-6545.05%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
200.90%
Investing flow of 200.90% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-161.73%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-193.28%
We reduce yoy buybacks while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a potential missed chance unless expansions promise higher returns.