PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-54.21%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 2.45%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-98.03%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.98%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-79.51%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-35.29%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
843.36%
Working capital of 843.36% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
216.47%
AR growth of 216.47% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
281.62%
Inventory growth of 281.62% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-2710.57%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-100.22%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
1908.77%
Under 50% of Energy median of 15.50% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-5.06%
Negative CFO growth while Energy median is 5.31%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
7.77%
CapEx growth of 7.77% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
89.85%
Acquisition growth of 89.85% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
91.97%
Growth of 91.97% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
71.97%
Under 50% of Energy median of 0.70% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
-100.07%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.91%
Buyback growth of 43.91% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.