PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
92.26%
Positive net income growth while Energy median is negative at -4.04%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-97.69%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is -0.06%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
-100.00%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-73.52%
SBC declines yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-98.91%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Energy median is -102.67%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-73.45%
AR shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-88.44%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
-24.95%
AP shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-105.01%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is -57.75%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
54.51%
Under 50% of Energy median of 70.79% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
82.45%
Positive CFO growth while Energy median is negative at -25.54%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
95.10%
CapEx growth under 50% of Energy median of 6.97% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
-285.61%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
96.23%
Under 50% of Energy median of 4.72% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
-108.96%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.