PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-82.70%
Negative net income growth while Energy median is 5.14%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
-9.28%
D&A shrinks yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
130.81%
SBC growth of 130.81% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or staff additions causing more equity grants.
49.14%
A slight increase while Energy median is negative at -77.94%. Peter Lynch might see peers reaping more free cash if they can do so without impacting sales.
51.86%
AR growth of 51.86% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
76.86%
Inventory growth of 76.86% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
459.92%
AP growth of 459.92% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-131.37%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Energy median is -100.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
86.99%
A moderate rise while Energy median is negative at -55.69%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
89.72%
Positive CFO growth while Energy median is negative at -16.61%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
100.00%
CapEx growth under 50% of Energy median of 12.49% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Growth of 100.00% while Energy median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
100.00%
Under 50% of Energy median of 9.39% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
-102.53%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
-78.77%
We reduce issuance yoy while Energy median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see an advantage in preserving per-share value unless expansions are neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.