PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.86%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ENPH's 1.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
28.91%
Positive gross profit growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
151.45%
Positive EBIT growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
151.45%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 26.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
257.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 24.63%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
254.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x ENPH's 21.74%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
240.65%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x ENPH's 22.73%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
3.42%
Slight or no buybacks while ENPH is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
9.97%
Slight or no buyback while ENPH is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-371.63%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-70.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.51%
AR growth well above ENPH's 17.72%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-0.82%
Inventory is declining while ENPH stands at 20.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
38.41%
Asset growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.34%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
25.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x ENPH's 9.32%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
112.50%
Debt growth far above ENPH's 2.21%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
38.32%
We increase R&D while ENPH cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
6.12%
We expand SG&A while ENPH cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.