PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
1.52 - 1.58
1.19 - 3.37
354.5K / 984.1K (Avg.)
-1.64 | -0.94
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.84%
Revenue growth above 1.5x ENPH's 1.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
74.47%
Positive gross profit growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
122.62%
Positive EBIT growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
203.70%
Operating income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 26.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
159.66%
Net income growth above 1.5x ENPH's 24.63%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
160.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x ENPH's 21.74%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
164.29%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x ENPH's 22.73%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.57%
Slight or no buybacks while ENPH is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.45%
Slight or no buyback while ENPH is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
143.24%
Positive OCF growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
88.10%
Positive FCF growth while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
417.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ENPH's 20.31%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
417.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x ENPH's 174.77%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
417.66%
Positive 3Y CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-65.03%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while ENPH stands at 176.50%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-65.03%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-65.03%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
209.07%
Below 50% of ENPH's 2178.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
209.07%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x ENPH's 174.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
209.07%
Positive short-term CAGR while ENPH is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.49%
AR growth well above ENPH's 17.72%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
6.41%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. ENPH's 20.13%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
8.04%
Asset growth above 1.5x ENPH's 2.34%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.78%
50-75% of ENPH's 9.32%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.68%
We increase R&D while ENPH cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
27.62%
We expand SG&A while ENPH cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.